A plain answer for mentors: what’s structurally different, so you can judge it yourself.
On our platform, a specialist runs the layer around your mentoring: the offer, the page, the matching, the session tracking. You approve everything. It ships under your name. That’s the whole model: not an agency that builds and disappears, not one more app that hands you another login and leaves the admin yours.
The gap it closes is administrative, not philosophical. Matching by hand takes ten minutes a pair. Manually run programs strain past 50 participants. Then there’s the number worth having: mentees stay at 72%, against 49% for non-participants. Only a program that tracks its sessions can claim it. Agencies won’t track them. Software waits for you to do it. We do both, as one team that answers for the result. If you find another company doing that whole job, we’d genuinely like to know.
A founder recently wrote about firing her agency: “They weren’t using AI as a tool. They were outsourcing their taste to it…” She went on: “I want AI to make talented people faster. I don’t want it to make mediocre work cheaper.”
She’s right, and the numbers agree. Content people merely suspect is machine-written rates 48% less trustworthy and 57% less authentic (Raptive, 2025). Suspicion alone does the damage. That’s why every deliverable here carries a named specialist’s sign-off. AI drafts. A specialist reviews. You approve. It ships under your name.
Want the receipts (named competitors, public prices, linked sources)? The full case is here.
Practice.do and Profi are both gone. So ask any provider the harder question: will you exist next year? Our answer: independent, revenue-funded, a fixed price on a written scope, and your data exportable from day one. If we ever part ways, you leave with everything (your page, your pairs, your records). Read how switching works.
Or see every service for mentors first.